The European Union, the United States, and a number of other state actors have adopted policies obliging
companies to conduct supply chain due diligence regarding the import of natural resources. While
several authors have analyzed the motives of these measures individually, this article provides a broader
explanation for their diffusion. In empirical terms, it focuses on ‘conflict minerals’ and illegally logged
timber.
Building on the classical norm life cycle, the article’s argument is threefold. ...
The European Union, the United States, and a number of other state actors have adopted policies obliging
companies to conduct supply chain due diligence regarding the import of natural resources. While
several authors have analyzed the motives of these measures individually, this article provides a broader
explanation for their diffusion. In empirical terms, it focuses on ‘conflict minerals’ and illegally logged
timber.
Building on the classical norm life cycle, the article’s argument is threefold. Firstly, it argues that these
mandatory due diligence policies are the result of a new foreign accountability norm concerning the
conditions under which natural resources are extracted. Secondly, it shows that the emergence of this
norm is the result of strategic framing, in particular by moral entrepreneurs. International NGOs have
successfully advocated the foreign accountability norm by placing it within already existing free market
norms, instead of provoking open confrontation. Thirdly, in addition to the classical norm life cycle, the
article shows that agency has also played a crucial role in the current phase of norm cascade. ‘Fair
business’ entrepreneurs benefit from new markets for certified products, such as ‘conflict free’ phones,
and their marketing enhances the norm cascade.
+